Copernican and Evolution

NASA’s Agenda Promoting Copernicanism & Evolutionism

Copernican 2
Source: fixedearth.com

NASA has a spiritual agenda. Yes, spiritual. It projects the image of cutting-edge science opening exciting space frontiers for the good of mankind, but the facts say otherwise. Judge for yourself:

On the Space Administration’s Web Page we read: “NASA’s ORIGINS PROGRAM will search for clues to help us find our cosmic roots.”

“Cosmic roots…?? Origins…???

There are two major beliefs about the origin of mankind and all other life forms. One says God created man and everything else not very long ago. The Bible states this view over 100 times and allows for no other explanation. God created everything fully formed as part of an eternal plan, the Bible teaches. Period. The other belief says everything came to be as it is accidentally and randomly as the result of natural forces acting upon themselves and “evolving” over billions of years. Clearly, the evolutionary belief is anti-Bible, but–more to the point about NASA’s goals being spiritual–it is a belief that attributes miraculous powers of creation of all that exists to a “force” or a god known as “matter” (and “gases”). Matter did it all. All hail “matter”! No God who demands recognition and accountability is needed! With “matter” as creator we can do what we want (’cause nothing matters…).

As might be expected, a compromise belief has arisen out of these two opposites. It is called “theistic evolutionism”. This view acknowledges that there has to be a God to explain the mind-blowing design that exists any which way we turn. But, says the Theistic Evolutionist, this God did not create everything fully formed but used an evolutionary process over billions of years to do the job. This evolution-dependent compromise allows a Creator God of sorts, but does not allow the Omniscient and Omnipotent Creator God Who authored the Bible.

Therefore, NASA’s stated goal of searching space for clues to man’s origins reveals the premise behind their taxpayer supported Origins Program. That premise is that evolution is true and the Bible is not. This premise is not secular; it is spiritual. It claims to be scientific and therefore independent of religion. It is not scientific, as we shall see. It is religious, as we shall also see. The evolutionary premise violates all known science and logic. It does not have the first piece of verifiable evidence to support the squirrely evolution myth it calls “scientific”. Evolutionism embodies a single spiritual agenda, viz., disqualify and replace the Bible as the source of Truth.

In support of its Origins Program, NASA says it will answer such questions as:

“Are there any planets outside our solar system that are capable of supporting life?”

“How did life originate on earth?”

“Is there life (however primitive or evolved) outside our solar system?”

Under the heading “ORIGINS SCIENCE” we see that NASA makes it plain that its goal of establishing extraterrestrial evolutionism is symbiotically connected to its dependency on another “scientific” hypothesis. Note this connection and the dependency upon the unproven Big Bang hypothesis that NASA is using to achieve its goal of establishing evolutionism as a “fact”. From part of its Web Page we read:

“NASA’s ORIGINS PROGRAM follows the 15-billion year long chain of events from the birth of the Universe at the Big Bang, through the formation of the chemical elements, galaxies, stars, and planets, through the mixing of chemicals and energy that cradles life on Earth, to the earliest self-replicating organisms and the profusion of life.”

Seen in this statement is the unmistakable dependency of NASA’s evolutionary agenda upon the Big Bang Myth. That Myth grants them and others the billions of years that the Evolution Myth requires. “Time” is indeed the hero of this plot!

NASA goes on to say that “The long-term goals of ORIGINS address fundamental questions about our place in the Universe:

How did galaxies form in the early universe and what role do galaxies play in the appearance of planetary systems and life?

How do stars and planetary systems form and are there life-sustaining planets around other stars?

How did life originate on Earth and does it exist elsewhere in the universe?”

Now notice very carefully HOW all this is to be accomplished:

“ORIGINS will use revolutionary new technologies to investigate these questions…”

Underscore revolutionary new technologies! They are revolutionary all right! Under the next heading we will see the utter deception that NASA is building into these “revolutionary new technologies”. Further along, we will see that these technologies are designed to achieve their Bible-bashing goal of establishing extraterrestrial evolutionism thru the use of highly sophisticated VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATIONS.

For the moment though, let’s just add a thing or two to further establish that: 1) NASA’s goal in its Origins Program is to settle the argument over Origins in favor of evolutionism, & 2) That this goal is Spiritual rather than scientific.

We can read many places that the late Dr. Carl Sagan (d.Dec.’96) was closely associated with NASA’s planetary exploration involving The Mariner, Viking, Voyager, and Galileo missions. What we don’t read about in many places is that Sagan was an avid pot-head. His biographer, Kay Davidson, AP writer Scott Andrews, Harvard Psychiatry Prof. Grinspoon, his widow, Ann Druyan, etc., all confirm that his essays and scientific insights were products of marijuana assisted inspirations. That Sagan was totally sold on the evolutionary explanation for all that exists is reflected in all his writings (the evolution of the human brain, little telescoping critters on the moon, his famous Cosmos TV series, etc.). He carried that zeal for replacing Biblical creationism with evolutionism over into his highly praised work at NASA. Indeed, one Web bio summed up those years by noting that: “He played a leading role in the American space program since its inception.” In a posthumous award to Dr. Sagan, (change the “g” to a “t”),”the National Science Foundation declared that his research transformed planetary science….”

Sagan capsulized his belief about man’s significance thusly: “Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people.”

This evolution-grounded nihilistic mindset has been prevalent in and out of academia for several generations. It’s not surprising that Sagan embraced it, nor that few if any dissenters toward that mindset would be found in NASAdom. By the time Sagan (and lots of us) went to the University, eight or ten generations of increasingly sophisticated indoctrination had seemingly closed and locked the door against any challenge to the Copernican Model which made the Earth go around the Sun instead of the Sun going around the Earth, as the Bible taught. The ever-increasing spread of Darwinism after the 1850’s demanded millions and then billions of years for evolution to take place. Clearly, the Sun, Moon, and Stars had to be billions of years old too for they could not be younger than the Earth. Indeed, a universe billions of years old was the only way Evolutionism could lay hold on the billions of years it needs to lend even superficial credibility to its fantastic claims.

So, let it be set in factual concrete: Copernicanism and Darwinism (i.e., Heliocentricity and Evolutionism) are Siamese Twins. Appearing first, Copernicanism paved the way for Darwinism’s success by using invented mathematical models in the physical science “disciplines” of Astronomy and Physics, and by contradicting the Bible’s teaching about an immovable Earth at the center of Creation with the Sun going around daily. Darwinism then reinforced Copernicanism by requiring billions of years for everything to evolve. Now the Biological Sciences had joined with the Physical Sciences in contradicting the Biblical Creation with its young Earth and Man as the special Creation of God, made in His Own Image and with an option for eternal life on a heavenly New Earth. All that was needed by the time of Sagan’s University days was a way to get rid of the stubborn, lingering belief in God’s Creation of Mankind in six literal (“evening and morning”) days. This belief had to be put on a level with the almost totally defeated and forgotten belief in a very special unmovable Earth at the center of God’s plans. Nobody argued for that anymore, but hundreds of millions of people were still clinging to a conviction that evolution theory was total nonsense and that Mankind is the special creation of an Almighty God with a great purpose and plan for His Creation. How could this resistance to evolution be ended once and for all??

That was the challenge that faced hallucinating “exobiologist” Sagan and Co. when he got in the driver’s seat at NASA. In that position, taxpayer’s billions of dollars could provide the ways and means to eliminate all challenges to the Big Bang model as the “scientific” explanation for the origin of the universe, Earth included. Then thru the development of cutting-edge computerized telescope and camera technology a way was opening up to settle the creation/evolution controversy forever in favor of evolution.

Of course, Sagan’s total commitment to evolutionism (in tandem with Biologist J. Gould at Harvard) was spread far and wide thru his TV Cosmos series and his books at the time computer technology was developing. He taught that widespread extraterrestrial evolution was a certainty and would soon be proven. He was at the center of NASA’s drive for perfecting computerized telescopes and cameras with Virtual Reality technology for a dozen years before he died. But he didn’t live to see the job completed. Just a couple of years before his death, he admitted in his article “The Search for Extraterrestrial Life” in the Scientific American (’94) that of all of his NASA supported missions: “None of these [spacecraft] encounters has yielded compelling, or even strongly suggestive, indications of extraterrestrial life.”

That’s a pretty strong confession when you think about it. Indeed, “Exobiology” is a “science” without any data…the ultimate oxymoron.

In 1992, four years before Sagan’s death, Daniel Saul Goldin became NASA’s Administrator. His policies have since earned him many accolades, including the title of “brilliant visionary” and being named “one of the 100 most influential men and women in government”. No one questions his ability to vigorously and innovatively fulfill NASA’s stated goals. His vision has nowhere “been more evident than in his comprehensive strategy for space exploration”. We want to take a very close look at the main components of that “comprehensive strategy” momentarily, but let the overriding goal of that strategy be understood and underscored yet again.

Mr. Goldin has not altered the goal of finding extraterrestrial life forms and establishing evolutionism as a “scientific fact” which will no longer can be contested by anyone. Indeed, his administration has streamlined NASA’s whole operation by putting those revolutionary new technologies mentioned earlier on afterburners, as it were. Mr. Goldin means to see NASA’s goal accomplished, and he means to do it speedily.

His Web bio reveals that: “He initiated the ORIGINS PROGRAM to understand how the Universe has evolved, to learn how life began on Earth and to see if life exists elsewhere.” (Goldin update: HERE)

Posted in Copernicus | Tagged | Leave a comment

An Infinite Universe or a Finite Universe

The Universe: Finite or Infinite?

Universe 1

   It will have been noticed by other Creationists, I am sure, that the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) position about the expanse of the universe is that it is infinite. Two quotations from Dr. Henry Morris will suffice to establish this position: a) “…the universe is boundless, and it is not even possible to define the center of infinite space. Therefore, we have to always use the concept of relative motion when we talk about motions of the heavenly bodies….”(“ICR’s OFFICIAL, UNOFFICIAL POSITION ON GEOCENTRICITY”, From: Biblical Astronomer, #93, Summer 2000); b) “Again and again God reminds us that ‘all the earth is mine’ (Exodus 19:5) and [Morris adds this to the Scripture:] “even the infinite heavens belong to Him.” (Days of Praise,7/2/00 entry).

   The rationale given is that God is Infinite, ergo, the universe is infinite.

   In addition to all that is involved in their Scriptureless stonewalling of science-supported Bible geocentrism and their muted, but nonetheless overt support of Bible-bashing heliocentricity, the ICR rationale about the universe being infinite because God is Infinite falls flat both logically and Scripturally. Note:

1) Logically, our Infinite God could create a finite universe or He would not be Infinite. Period and paragraph. End of argument.

2) As for Scriptural support for an infinite universe, the situation is the same as with Scriptural support for Copernicanism; that is to say, none exists…. The finite nature of the universe, on the other hand, is assured many places in Scripture. One of the most obvious examples is found in Isaiah 66:22 where God promises both New heavens and a New earth and declares the promise fulfilled in Rev. 20:11 & 21:1. The old heavens and earth are obviously finite entities that can both be done away with and replaced so that the new heavens and new earth entities can assume their eternal role. (More on this at: “The Bible Teaches A “New”, Not A “Re-newed” Earth.”)

   All Scriptures that teach a New Earth and New Heavens also teach a finite universe. The first Heavens and Earth constitute a universal entity that was created, that has a history, and is destroyed, never to be seen again. That creation was (and temporarily remains) a finite creation.

   From a purely Creationist standpoint, the embrace and promotion of an infinite universe concept plays directly into the hands of those who are poised to finish off the Creationist opposition to evolutionism! Here is how this works:

  1. A) An infinite, boundless space concept opens wide the door for evolution-indoctrinated cosmologists to postulate and publicize anything they can come up with about the existence of galaxies and planets and life forms in deep space. Who can effectively combat these claims??

   The battlefield over the evolution question has shifted dramatically in the last two or three decades. Evolutionists don’t bother debating Creationist scientists (and loosing) over earthly evolution much any more. However, the avalanche of Star Trekian TV and movie themes and books involving extraterrestrials, and all the Saganesque assurances that the universe has got to be swarming with life forms in various stages of evolution, is the new battlefield, in case anyone hasn’t figured that out. NASA’s “Origins Program” embodies today’s strategy for clearing the battlefield of Creationists once and for all.

   How can the Creationist leadership do anything but help the evolutionist’s “Origins Program” when–by their own embrace of the infinite universe concept– they actually grant the Saganites everything they need space-wise and time-wise to give their probability statistics an air of reasonableness? Recent reports, for example, of the discovery of another galaxy ten Billion light years away and the discovery of a planet thirteen Billion light years away (give us a break, please!) can get no meaningful rebuttal from infinite universe advocates at ICR. Dr. Henry Morris wrote recently: “Astronomers estimate that at least ten trillion trillion stars exist in the heavens….” (Days of Praise, 7/22/00). Comparably goofy claims by earth-bound evolutionary scientists would be dismissed out of hand by Dr. Morris, and rightly so. But cosmologists can claim anything “out there” and it doesn’t seem to phase him.  (Besides, it seems Scripturally relevant to note Psalm 147:4: “HE counts the number of the stars; HE calls them all by their names.”  Is that number “at least ten trillion trillion”?  Has God given “at least ten trillion trillion” individual names to the stars which HE has declared repeatedly will be destroyed and replaced with New Heavens?  Or is this just cosmological /evolutionary style hyperbole at the end of a huge list of contra-scientific assumptions??  “Come now, and let us reason together…” Isaiah [1:18] speaks of a God who is reasonable….)

   Aside from the incomprehensibly great level of credulity Dr. Morris and other Creationists are willing to extend to space scientists hypothesizing all over the place about things they have not seen and about which they have no real data, the danger of this attitude from the Creationist standpoint is this: Such credulity aids and abets the 15 billion years presently upholding the Big Bang paradigm which includes a 4.6 billion year old earth, an age which is totally anathema to the Creationist young-earth position!

   In plain words, ICR has battled commendably against all claims of earth-bound evolution, but is somewhere between ineffective and counterproductive in the real and final battle over Creationism vs Evolutionism which is being settled in the Space Program. One more time: ICR and other Creationists impressively battle evolutionist claims of millions and billions of years of macro-evolutionism on earth on the one hand; then with the other hand they grant an infinitely large universe to evolutionary cosmologists who declare that it took those millions and billions of years to get a universe this big and that a 4.6 billion year old earth is a space “fact” that is on the books and not about to be changed.

   Does Dr. Morris or anyone else really believe that embracing the illogical and contra-Scriptural infinity position does not serve the evolutionist cause by supplying the one ingredient evolutionists must have to establish extraterrestrial evolution (and cinch earthly evolution)?? That one indispensable ingredient is TIME, and both the basically unintelligible “infinite universe” concept and the equally unintelligible Big Bang concept with its 15 billion years of Expanding Universe provide that indispensable ingredient. The bottom line here is that belief in an infinite universe actually encourages belief in the Big Bang paradigm (which ICR rejects!) and thus allows the 4.6 billion year old earth that home-grown evolutionism thrives on….

  1. B) ICR’s belief in an Infinite Universe also precludes any possibility of accepting a stationary earth with the sun going around, no matter how insistent the Scriptures are on the subject (HERE). After all, not only the sun, but the stars also must orbit the earth in the Scriptural non-moving-earth system. Clearly, if Dr. Morris et al accept the cosmologist’s exotic claims of billions of light year distances to stars from earth, the compelling conclusion is that even God couldn’t get those stars around the earth every day; hence the geocentrism model couldn’t be right and Creationists must make those scores of non moving earth Scriptures say the opposite of what they say….      

   Consequently, what ICR and other Creationists who follow Dr. Henry Morris’ insistence on an infinite universe need to realize is:

  1. a) The Biblical Model of the Universe is not only inescapably finite, it is no more than one half of one light day thick, and has a built-in design mechanism that is scientifically unimpeachable. The seven part series which provides confirmation for those conclusions begins HERE and is entitled: “The Size and Structure of the Universe According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science.”
  2. b) The 15 billion year old and 15 billion light year thick universe of today’s cosmology is actually promoted by Creationist adherence to a universe of “infinite” size. It is time that Creationists realize that the ruling cosmological “creation scenario”, i.e., The Big Bang Paradigm, is not a secular concept, but is demonstrably  the fulfillment of a  “creation scenario” derived from anti-Bible, anti-Christ Kabbalist Rabbinical writings which go back at least to the 1st century and are plainly spelled out by contemporary Kabbalists.  
  3. c) The continuance of the entire masquerade–namely, Kabbalist/Talmudic Phariseeism disguised at “Theoretical Science”–is completely and unalterably dependent upon a “fail-safe” prevention of any exposure of the Copernican Model of a rotating, orbiting Earth as being a clever lie. As can be seen throughout the “Size and Structure…” links and HERE and elsewhere, all of modern Kabbalistic Kosmology crumbles when Copernican Heliocentricity is exposed as a contra-scientific myth.
  4. d) The message for genuine Creationists and all Truth lovers will soon become strikingly–and even painfully– clear, namely: The continuing triumph of the evolutionary mind-set that now underpins virtually all of modern man’s “knowledge” (HERE) depends on the maintenance of an anti-Biblical “creation scenario” which is in turn dependent upon maintaining the Copernican Model of a moving Earth, denied in the Bible, but supported by the Creationist organizations.
  5. e) The bottom line: Creationists who support an infinite universe and a rotating, orbiting earth are not only providing the needed rationale for the Bible-destroying Big Bang-Expanding Universe Paradigm, but are also blocking a Creationist attack on Copernican Heliocentricity which is the Achilles Heel of the whole Kabbalist “creation scenario” which has established extraterrestrial and terrestrial evolutionism and all but destroyed Bible credibility from its first page to its last page.

        When Creationists and all other people learn how heliocentricity triumphed without the first piece of indisputable proof, they will simultaneously learn something vastly more important; indeed, they will realize in an unshakable way: a) That–since the Copernican Revolution–there has been a steady acceleration in a movement to dethrone the God of the Bible as the author of Truth and Goodness and replace Him with “science falsely so-called”, and: b) That–in these last 4 1/2 centuries particularly–this replacement of God and the Bible as the final source of Truth by hypothetical science has been accomplished primarily through abstract math gone wild and capable of “proving” anything, and: c) By caving in on Bible inerrancy where geocentrism is concerned, the Christian Church opened the door for the Devil to establish the evolution myth as “science”…and then to spin off that lie with other Bible-bashing isms (Marxism, Freudianism, Einsteinism, Saganism), to the end that man’s “knowledge” which runs today’s world is pure “foolishness” to God.

   The senior Dr. Morris’ belief in an infinite universe and his awe-struck belief in the claims of mostly secular scientists and physicists is, I must admit, a bit of a mystery to me. One would think that a man of such proven ability and energy and love of the Word of God, and such a long time witness of the exaggerations and outright prevarications of evolutionary scientists, would be the most wary and suspicious of men when it comes to accepting the ever fluid and ephemeral hypotheses of secular scientists and their almost daily “discoveries” of “life signs” beyond earth somewhere. Surely he must recognize that these scientists have the same degree of vested interests in promoting their extraterrestrial “discoveries” as evolutionary scientists have in promoting their terrestrial ones. Surely he must realize that these cosmologists serve up thick slices of pseudo-scientific baloney with the same regularity and excited hype as the evolutionary mythologists hawk their nonsense. Both groups have their theories stamped on both sides: “Real Science! Don’t Challenge!” Surely he realizes the deep and abiding loathing of Scriptural evidence that dominates the thinking of evolutionary scientists, so why act as if the secular cosmologists who are evolutionists are any different? Why disbelieve one cadre of evolutionists and believe the other? Why challenge everything one stands for, and agree with the basics (boundless universe, and relativity with no possible earthly inertia) that the other stands for… ESPECIALLY when both are flatly repudiated in Scripture and just as flatly advocated in anti-Bible, anti-Christ mystic Kabbalism?!

   There is no difference in the approach of these two cadres of pseudo-scientists (terrestrial and extra-terrestrial evolutionists) when it comes to dumbing down the world’s populations. They just keep saying something and presenting it over and over and over thru every media outlet…until people quit questioning what they are saying, having become fearful that they will look like idiots if they do. Creationists know that evolutionism is a gargantuan lie that could be destroyed in a 5-10 hour TV series. They know that the reason the lie keeps growing is because it is presented everywhere with ever increasing boldness as something “scientific”…a scientific fact. “Hand’s off you Bible-thump’n nitwits!” evolutionists can be heard to mutter through clinched teeth when challenged. And if this is the case with terrestrial evolutionism–which still has a trained and vocal host of people against it (thanks in great part to Dr. Morris at ICR and other Creationists)–then it is easy to see how horrified the “science” establishment becomes at the mere mention of opening up the long-settled heliocentricity model to investigation and testing. “Oh my! It’s just too abthurd to even conthider! I mean, we are thimply aghast!” Or: “It’s a fact, stupid! Don’t even think about challenging it!”

——-

     Beyond any doubt–if Scripture be one’s sole guide…as it must be for Bible Creationists!–the present heavens were finite when created and are finite when it can be said that they–along with the earth–will have “…fled away; and there was found no place for them” (Rev. 20:11) and “will not even be remembered or come to mind…” (Isaiah 65:17).

   And just as Scripturally certain, the promised separate creation of New Heavens and a New Earth (Isaiah 65:17; 66:22) is speaking of two finite entities. Notice: “And I [John] saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away…” (Rev.21:1). John didn’t say that the heavens and the earth we now have would be ‘re-newed” or burnt off and re-upholstered. He said that they are finite entities that will pass away when a New Earth in a New Heavens will “come down” right in the spot from whence the old earth has “fled away”. Peter wrote that not only the earth but the heavens as well would “melt…be burned up…be dissolved” (Gr. “utterly consumed”) and that Christians should look for the promised New Earth, didn’t he (II Pet.3:10-13)? You can’t get much plainer than that!

   If, then, Scripture plainly declares that this universe with its created heavens and earth will flee away and be replaced by another earth and other heavens, it is equally plain that the present universe is finite and not infinite.

——-

   As far as I can tell from thirty years of listening, many (perhaps most) creationists would not go along with the infinite universe concept if they understood how it aids and abets the destruction of the Bible’s Creation Account and its replacement with today’s Kabbalist Big Bang Paradigm disguised as “Science”.   In fact, the concept of “infinity” itself is known to be one of the most recalcitrant problems of natural philosophy. It would seem that few natural scientists, Creationists or not, would want to lean on something so philosophically mushy and make it the backbone of their concept of the universe. The concept is not Scriptural; it is not logical; it is not scientifically sustainable; it is even philosophically squishy. So why, as a Bible Creationist, embrace it? Does it help in fighting evolutionism, ICR’s reason to exist?? If so, how? Or, does it contribute to a blindness that hobbles Creationists in that fight, and actually–if left unchallenged–does it assure further and further retreat and ultimate defeat??

——-

   Anyway, with Mr. Infinite Universe ignominiously limping off the field, we can turn our attention to the Biblical teaching of New Heavens and a New Earth. Obviously, this is a teaching of the keenest relevancy to our part of this finite “universe”…so that one topic fuses with the other quite naturally.

   Does the Bible teach that “New” really means “Re-new”–as not only ICR, but practically all Baptists, Pentecostals, Jehovah Witnesses, and some others teach–or does it actually mean “New” as in NEW? And if “New” means “New”–as we have already begun to see that it does–how does that fact prevent all those steeped in the “Re-new” doctrine from seeing what the Devil has cooked up for the world and has cleverly hidden under the normal work and aspirations of the heliocentricity-dependent “Space Program”?!

Posted in Sun Moon Stars | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Outer Space Exposed

Outer Space Exposed

International Space Station Exposed

Posted in fake satellite flight, flat earth discussion | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Mike Adams and Guest Talks About NASA Fakery

Mike Adams Talks About NASA Fakery

Moon 1

Mike Adams doesn’t talk about the flat Earth, except in saying he doesn’t believe in it, as he’s a globe earth believer, but he does talk about the fake Moon landing with a guest. Too bad he doesn’t realise that the Moon is not a solid planet in the sky.

The man interviewed made the film, “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon,” and agreed with the Adams that the Earth is not flat, and that the Moon circles the earth and that both circle the Sun. How they can admit that after admitting that the Moon landing was fake. Some people just can’t face reality; they won’t check things out for themselves.

So, this video is just of interest in the fake Moon landing.

Click Here

Posted in alternative news | Tagged | Leave a comment

Globe Earth Belief is Dying

Globe Earth Belief is Dying

Dave talked about Mike Adams, starting about the 34-minute mark, of how he was booted off his platform after he got into the flat earth. Dave does admit that Adams does good work but he is wrong about the nature of the earth.

Mars drone 9b

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

Flat Earth Comes to a High School

Finally, Some Kids Get an Education

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

Some Rockets are Balloons

Some Rockets are Balloons

Posted in flat earth discussion | Tagged | Leave a comment

Pastor Discovered that the Earth is Flat

He Checked Scriptures to Find this is True

Posted in Weekly Sermon | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Flat Earth on Reality TV

Talk on the Flat Earth on National TV

Flat earth on TV 2

There was a program that came on UK TV 11 April, 2024 that there was a talk by a flat earther. This was on the program “Wife Swap”. No, it’s not what you think! It’s a program where the wife of one family goes to another family and vice versa, where they have to live by the rules of the family for three days and the next three days, they set up their own rules as they have at home. The people who were flat earthers are a mixed-raced couple. Aside from that, the flat earth believer father and mother were able to say what that they believed in a flat earth. The man also said that 9-11 was an inside job, and the schools teach lies.

This is a first that I heard of a TV show talking about the flat earth. Naturally, a lot more could be said, and probably was said, but was edited out. Hopefully, with millions of people watching, there are some who will examine the issue for the first time. So, keep spreading the truth, dear readers.

The picture above is the man who talked about the flat earth.

In short, here is another indication that the truth about the flat stationary earth is getting out.

Posted in alternative news | Tagged | Leave a comment

Squat the Squatters

How to Get Criminals Out of Your Home

Posted in alternative news | Tagged | Leave a comment